Who is counting?

One of James LaMountain’s attorneys is in the process of filing another lawsuit in connection with the hillside property off Mashapaug Road. I lost track and don’t know how many frivolous lawsuits the town filed against the owner’s of the hillside property and how many lawsuits the owners had to file against the town to protect their rights.
Brian Johnson denied James LaMountain a driveway permit even so LaMountain filed all the necessary documents and has a legitimate claim of entitlement in the permit. The denial of the driveway permit is part of the Johnson/Wettlaufer scheme to harass the owners of the hillside property, Northeast Concepts, Chad Brigham, Mike LaMountain and his father James LaMountain, with repeated litigation (paid for by the taxpayers).
The driveway issue is not the only matter that will be adjudicated; the complaint also accuses the town for dumping sediments onto their beachside property. This is an allegation that was originally brought up by the town against the owners of the hillside property.
James P. LaMountain’s attorney in this matter is Edward M. Pikula, Esqire. Attorney Pikula is not just another attorney, Mr. Pikula is the town solicitor of the town of Springfield, Massachusetts. Pikula argued the case Springfield v. Kibbe, 480 U.S. 257 (1987) before the Supreme Court of the United States. Certiorari was granted in this case to resolve the question whether, consistently with the decision in Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U. S. 658, a municipality can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for inadequate training of its employees. The Supreme Court ruled against the town of Springfield in a five to four decision. To read the complaint Pikula is filing on behalf of James LaMountain, click here!
The complaint is in part based on an investigation conducted by Milone & MacBroom, Inc., a consulting firm providing services in Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Water Resource Engineering & Environmental Planning, Landscape Architecture, and Surveying & Construction Management. A true copy of the Milone & MacBroom intestigative report is attached to the complaint as Exhibit F.
To read the report, click here! The report about the investigation conducted by Milone & MacBroom, Inc., proves that what the town accused the plaintiffs of doing (dumping sediments into the lake), is actually the town’s own doing! The pictures shown on page 25 and following pages in the report tell the story and prove the allegations made by the town officials as lies.
Peter Frei

Posted on 9 Jul 2009, 00:01 - Category: Ongoing And Past Litigation
Edit - Delete


Posted on 11 Jul 2009, 20:35 by Jim L
Scott Boucher
It is funny.. When the Bouchers complained about Indy the Giant German Shepherd, the selectmen ordered the dog be removed from town.

Wettlaufer Johnson and Peterson bent over backwards to accomadodate the Complaining neighbors who had been fed the usual lies about me.

Anyhow the order to remove our family pet and farm worker Indy from Holland was Illegal and the Selectmen folded the day they were supposed to explain their Illegal act to a Judge in Palmer.
Indy is now almost 8 and is approx 175 lbs. He loves Holland and I bet his IQ could rival Papa Peetees brood combined.
So now Mr Boucher riles the troops and brings 250 signatures to stop the environmental time bomb of the Flying J from being built in Holland on the Sacred Indian Land.
If you ride up into Herb Holdens pit (in a dumptruck with cash) in union you would not believe the infrastructure being constructed in the woods of Holland. Is there any permits for this work in Holland woods yet. Talk about cutting trees. For every load we take out I bet they take 10.

So back to the Boucher "troublemakers" I say.. Well Done. I say Boucher has the juice to beat Earl in the next Election. I hear he is a hardworker in the medical profession who puts family first. I even think that he is ethical and honest. But I only spoke to him once or twice. He is also an Azzhole at times. Thats not always a bad thing though.

Put up your no parking signs Earl (everyone knows it is retaliation for johnsongate and this blog ) although we already have enough evidence of your corruption the fact you stooges voted to affect that property of ours at your last meeting even after a conflict of interest has been declared by the State Ethics Commission speaks volumns of your contempt of the laws that govern society.

Mr Boucher. Lets see you and your friends at the special town meeting. I will help you with your cause as I can. You troublemaker you.

Peace to all.. Even you idiots. (you know who you are)


Your Comments are welcomed, add one!

(no email-sign-up or other gimmick necessary, just start blogging away... I do not plant any cookies on your hard drive either!)
(will appear on the left under "Latest Comments"
(your name if you are brave, or alias)
Comment (goes here, 3,600 characters max! Save comment with “Ctrl” “C” so you don’t lose the text if something goes wrong)
How much is 3 times 13 plus 1 divided by 2? (please enter result)
Password (make one up and make a note so you remember it next time. Your name or alias is protected this way!)